Top cited articles
Time to first decision:
0 days*
Time to first decision with review:
74 days*
Acceptance to publication:
24 days*
Impact Factor:
9.8
Total content views:
347,034
Total Altmetric mentions:
5,036
Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search
Overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma: a scoping review
Rapid access to innovative medicinal products while ensuring relevant health technology assessment. Position of the French National Authority for Health
How methodological pitfalls have created widespread misunderstanding about long COVID
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment
School closures during COVID-19: an overview of systematic reviews
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence
Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users
Enhancing title and abstract screening for systematic reviews with GPT-3.5 turbo
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial
Digitally enabled decentralised research: opportunities to improve the efficiency of clinical trials and observational studies
Open access journal publication in health and medical research and open science: benefits, challenges and limitations
Integrating large language models in systematic reviews: a framework and case study using ROBINS-I for risk of bias assessment
Ecological study estimating melanoma overdiagnosis in the USA using the lifetime risk method
Applying the time needed to treat to NICE guidelines on lifestyle interventions
Metro Mapping: development of an innovative methodology to co-design care paths to support shared decision making in oncology
Rapid reviews methods series: assessing the appropriateness of conducting a rapid review
Differences in shared decision-making: the East-West divide